A crisis rarely arrives with warning. How you communicate in the first hours makes the difference between a situation that's managed and one that defines you.
The Situation
When a crisis hits, organisations without clear communications leadership quickly become reactive, inconsistent and exposed. Statements are delayed. Messages contradict each other. Employees hear rumours before they hear from leadership. And what could have been contained becomes a story that takes on a life of its own.
The difference between a crisis that's managed well and one that causes lasting reputational damage rarely comes down to the severity of the incident. It comes down to how quickly, clearly and honestly you communicate — internally and externally — from the moment it breaks.
Preparation matters. But when the moment arrives, what matters most is having someone calm, experienced and decisive in your corner.
What I Know From Experience
As crisis communications lead at Avanade I managed situations ranging from data breaches and employee incidents to fatalities and terrorist incidents affecting our people. Some required close coordination with Accenture's global crisis team, given the potential impact on group reputation and share price.
What those situations taught me is that good crisis communications isn't about having the perfect statement. It's about staying calm, making clear decisions quickly, and keeping all your stakeholders informed and confident in your response — even when you don't have all the answers yet.
That experience, under real pressure, with real consequences, is what I bring to every crisis engagement.
How I Can Help
If this sounds like where you are, I'd love to have a conversation. Get in touch.
Want to understand how an engagement works? How I Work.
Copyright © 2026 Ubiquitous Comms - All Rights Reserved.
E: info@ubiquitous-comms.com T: +44 (0) 7795 827 301